International Journal of Arts and Humanities

Intersectionality and social psychology: identity crises and coping strategies of Roma LGBTQ+ persons in Hungary

Abstract

Numerous national and international comparative studies have indicated that Roma people in Hungary (e.g., Kende et al., 2020; Géczy & Gergelics, 2020; Géczy & Őry, 2020; etc.) and LGBTQ+ people (Takács & Szalma, 2015; Máté, 2018; etc.) are separately subject to high levels of prejudice and discrimination. The experiences of individuals who identify as both Roma and LGBTQ+ remain not well-addressed in Hungary (Máté, 2015). This study addresses the heightened disadvantage faced by Roma LGBTQ+ individuals, employing the framework of intersectionality (Crenshaw, 1989; 1991) to examine how overlapping identities related to ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity create unique challenges for individuals. Drawing on qualitative interviews with individuals of intersectional identity, the research integrates intersectionality theory with foundational concepts from social psychology, such as social identity (Tajfel, 1978), prejudice (Allport, 1999), and coping strategies (Breakwell, 1986). The findings provide insights into the lived experiences of Roma LGBTQ+ individuals, highlighting the specific ways they navigate their intersectional identities within a context of pervasive discrimination and prejudice. With the exploration of coping strategies, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the psychological and social processes involved in managing intersecting minority statuses.

Keywords: LGBTQ+, Roma, intersectionality, social psychology, identity, coping strategies, qualitative research